Home/Latest/Daniel Kinahan, Intergalactic Diplomacy, and the
World

Daniel Kinahan, Intergalactic Diplomacy, and the Subscription Economy at Edinburgh Fringe

Benjamin Cole
·3 min read·499 views
Key Takeaways

At this year’s Edinburgh Fringe, a trio of journalists—Adam, Caitríona Perry, and Joe Pike—took the stage to unpack a story that straddles crime, geopolitics, and the strange mecha…

At this year’s Edinburgh Fringe, a trio of

At this year’s Edinburgh Fringe, a trio of journalists—Adam, Caitríona Perry, and Joe Pike—took the stage to unpack a story that straddles crime, geopolitics, and the strange mechanics of modern media. Their conversation, recorded live before an audience, wove together threads that at first glance seem disparate: the rise of subscription-based reporting, the odd phrase “intergalactic affairs,” and the shadowy figure of alleged cartel boss Daniel Kinahan.

The panel opened with a lighthearted nod to the festival’s eclectic spirit, but quickly pivoted to serious fare. Perry, a seasoned political correspondent, drew parallels between the public’s appetite for true-crime narratives and the business models now propping up journalism. “We’re seeing readers pay not just for news, but for the experience of following a story as it unfolds,” she noted, pointing to the Kinahan case as a prime example of how high-stakes reporting can translate into sustained subscriber interest.

Pike, an investigative journalist, delved into the logistical and ethical challenges of covering organized crime from a distance. He described the painstaking process of verifying sources and the constant tension between informing the public and respecting legal boundaries. “Kinahan’s influence stretches across borders, but so does our accountability,” he said, referencing the cartel leader’s alleged ties to international drug trafficking and money laundering.

The conversation then took an unexpected turn toward

The conversation then took an unexpected turn toward what Adam jokingly called “intergalactic affairs”—a metaphor for the increasingly globalized, often surreal nature of crime and media. The group explored how digital platforms have turned local stories into international phenomena, and how that shift complicates everything from jurisdiction to audience trust. Perry offered a sobering counterpoint: “The same tools that let us reach millions can also amplify misinformation, so the burden on journalists is heavier than ever.”

As the session wrapped, the trio fielded questions from the crowd, touching on the future of investigative journalism and the ethics of monetizing tragedy. Pike summed up the mood: “If we can’t hold power to account—whether that’s a cartel boss or a tech giant—then we’re just entertainment. The subscription model only works if we keep delivering substance.” The audience left with a sense that the lines between news, entertainment, and global justice are more blurred—and more urgent—than ever.